Rarely do I get a chance to go to the movies these days. Yesterday I did, so I went to see Ender’s Game, a brand new movie adaptation of Orson Scott Card’s classic military sci-fi novel from 1985. I’ve never read the book, and always thought the premise sounded a bit gimmicky. Having seen the movie – which I think is pretty good overall – I’ll definitely will give it a read now.
Ender: “In the moment when I truly understand my enemy, understand him well enough to defeat him, then in that very moment I also love him. I think it’s impossible to really understand somebody, what they want, what they believe, and not love them the way they love themselves. And then, in that very moment when I love them…. I destroy them.”
#1 – Story & Spoilers!
All right. There really is no way to discuss this movie without spoiling at least one of the twists (which, as I said, I knew about beforehand, even though I never even read the book).
The story is set in the future, 50 years after humanity managed to fight back an invasion from an insectoid alien species called the Formics (a name made just for the movie, I hear).
Humanity is arming up for an inevitable new clash. Ender, the main character of the story, is a child-prodigy for space-combat warfare. He goes through various stages of training, eventually ending up in “Command School”, where he and his crew starts to simulate space-warfare with the Formics. The last “graduation” simulation is the battle for the Formics’ home-world.
Spoiler! Seriously!
After successfully completing the final mission, he (and the audience) finds out that the simulations weren’t simulations, but the real thing. When Ender destroyed the Formics’ home world in the last battle, he really did in that moment commit genocide, thinking he was only in a simulation.
There are a few other twists I will not spoil. And while this is (I think) a big reveal of the book, the movie doesn’t set it up to be a Shyamalan-style twist, but plays this part very openly (even hinting at in in the trailer), presumably because they knew they’re adapting a 30-year old book.
#2 – Ender’s Game Movie Trailer
#3 – Why I Want To Read The Book Now
In a nutshell, I want to read the book now, because I really liked the movie (and the many things it touched up), but also thought it sometimes felt like a story played at fast-forward. It felt a lot like an adaptation with lots of things missing or cut short, simply to keep it at movie-length.
The movie itself is largely made up of two parts.
The first part is Ender going through different stages of training, including fighting in a tactical zero-G combat game pitching different teams of recruits against each other. Obviously, Ender is the tactical genius among the recruits, and he wins these team-games (which are pretty nicely done effects-wise) and continues to move up the hierarchy.
It’s easy to see how this part could’ve deteriorated into a kind of Harry Potter / Quidditch in space. If the book would’ve been written in 2005 instead of 1985, it probably would have. Fortunately, Ender’s Game keeps this part mostly free of too many “school-competition” cliches. Instead, it raises some interesting questions on wartime leadership and the necessary qualities of a (future) military leader. It is definitely one of the parts where I hope the book provides a bit more depth.
The second part sees Ender quit the programme, being persuaded to re-join by his older Sister, and finally commanding humanity’s space fleet in the (not-so-simulated) war against the Formics.
Ender’s brother (who failed the programme for being too aggressive) and sister (who failed the programme for being too compassionate) also seem to carry symbolic meanings in the story that are only hinted at in the movie, especially as they appear in some of the more surreal scenes.
Also, the destruction of the Formics’ home world isn’t truly the end of the movie, and there’s a few more scenes that cramp a lot of heavy stuff into a few final minutes.
#3 – Final Thoughts
I’m not really a person doing movie reviews. If I were, there are a few points that should be mentioned. The movie has an odd pace at times. Harrison Ford, I thought, was miscast as Colonel Graff, because Harrison Ford is far too nice for the role he plays. He still looks like an older Han Solo who wants to crack one-liners, but can’t (because it wouldn’t fit this character).
Colonel Graff: “I am not the enemy.”
Ender: “I’m not so sure.”
Also, if you’re in it for lots of space battles-actions, you’ll probably be disappointed.
Ender’s Game is probably not “the best sci-fi” movie you’ll see this year, but it does manage to get a lot of that brooding “1980s sci-fi” across, which I thought was a rare treat in today’s action obsessed (sci-fi in particular) cinema.
Of course, Orson Scott Card, the author of Ender’s Game, is also known for having “pulled a Mel Gibson” on his career with some deeply reactionary views, so I wonder if/how this plays into his books from the 80s. It didn’t seem to affect the movie (which he also produced).
Anyhow. Let me know what you think.
- Have you seen Ender’s Game? Have you read the original book?
- Did you enjoy the movie? The book?
- Have you seen/read both? If so, how do you think they compare?
I’d love to hear from you in the comments below!
Z.