<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Imperial Knight Lancer vs. Warmachine Controversy</title>
	<atom:link href="/imperial-knight-lancer-vs-warmachine-controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://pinsofwar.com/imperial-knight-lancer-vs-warmachine-controversy/</link>
	<description>Warhammer 40K &#38; Wargaming Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 02:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lucidum</title>
		<link>https://pinsofwar.com/imperial-knight-lancer-vs-warmachine-controversy/#comment-6076</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lucidum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 08:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pinsofwar.com/?p=25041#comment-6076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PPC hardly has the monopoly on swooping, overarching armor plates and gigantic pauldrons. While we’re at it we might as well accuse World of Warcraft of stealing their look as well. I mean, yeah there’s a few similarities here and there, but the aesthetic is different enough that it’s definitely not image-theft.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PPC hardly has the monopoly on swooping, overarching armor plates and gigantic pauldrons. While we’re at it we might as well accuse World of Warcraft of stealing their look as well. I mean, yeah there’s a few similarities here and there, but the aesthetic is different enough that it’s definitely not image-theft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Kenedy</title>
		<link>https://pinsofwar.com/imperial-knight-lancer-vs-warmachine-controversy/#comment-5925</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Kenedy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pinsofwar.com/?p=25041#comment-5925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I first saw PP&#039;s Cygnar jacks (the light lancer) I was more reminded of a steam powered robot from a 2000AD story from the 90s - before I saw anything about epic in it.   Armoured Gideon, the story was called - it was insane.
There&#039;s only so much you can do with steam powered robots.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first saw PP&#8217;s Cygnar jacks (the light lancer) I was more reminded of a steam powered robot from a 2000AD story from the 90s &#8211; before I saw anything about epic in it.   Armoured Gideon, the story was called &#8211; it was insane.<br />
There&#8217;s only so much you can do with steam powered robots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krappklaus</title>
		<link>https://pinsofwar.com/imperial-knight-lancer-vs-warmachine-controversy/#comment-5924</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Krappklaus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 08:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pinsofwar.com/?p=25041#comment-5924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oddly enough, when Warmachine first came out I considered using the Warjacks as proxies for Epic titans because they pretty much looked like they would fit in just fine and were a bit cheaper...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oddly enough, when Warmachine first came out I considered using the Warjacks as proxies for Epic titans because they pretty much looked like they would fit in just fine and were a bit cheaper&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zweischneid</title>
		<link>https://pinsofwar.com/imperial-knight-lancer-vs-warmachine-controversy/#comment-5923</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zweischneid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 07:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pinsofwar.com/?p=25041#comment-5923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah. Dakkadakka. Also Beasts of War
http://www.beastsofwar.com/warhammer-40k/towering-knights-horizon-warhammer-40000/#comment-116156

But possibly I am overstating the problem? If so, all the better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. Dakkadakka. Also Beasts of War<br />
<a href="http://www.beastsofwar.com/warhammer-40k/towering-knights-horizon-warhammer-40000/#comment-116156" rel="nofollow">http://www.beastsofwar.com/warhammer-40k/towering-knights-horizon-warhammer-40000/#comment-116156</a></p>
<p>But possibly I am overstating the problem? If so, all the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John K.</title>
		<link>https://pinsofwar.com/imperial-knight-lancer-vs-warmachine-controversy/#comment-5922</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John K.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 07:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pinsofwar.com/?p=25041#comment-5922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dakkadakka is one

http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/1350/574064.page#6679096

Also so it in the BOLS comments


But it was certainly more hotly debated (because it was more controversial) with the original Knight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dakkadakka is one</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/1350/574064.page#6679096" rel="nofollow">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/1350/574064.page#6679096</a></p>
<p>Also so it in the BOLS comments</p>
<p>But it was certainly more hotly debated (because it was more controversial) with the original Knight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: belverker</title>
		<link>https://pinsofwar.com/imperial-knight-lancer-vs-warmachine-controversy/#comment-5921</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[belverker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 07:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pinsofwar.com/?p=25041#comment-5921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#039;t heard it about this version either, heard it alot when the knight released]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t heard it about this version either, heard it alot when the knight released</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Jackson</title>
		<link>https://pinsofwar.com/imperial-knight-lancer-vs-warmachine-controversy/#comment-5920</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Jackson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 07:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pinsofwar.com/?p=25041#comment-5920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think if you dig around, you&#039;ll find that nobody is saying that. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if you dig around, you&#8217;ll find that nobody is saying that. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Alexander</title>
		<link>https://pinsofwar.com/imperial-knight-lancer-vs-warmachine-controversy/#comment-5919</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Alexander]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 07:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pinsofwar.com/?p=25041#comment-5919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d like to know which people were saying that. I frequent several Wargaming forums, and haven&#039;t seen any such discussion. I hope my response here isn&#039;t too &quot;dyed-in-the-wool&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to know which people were saying that. I frequent several Wargaming forums, and haven&#8217;t seen any such discussion. I hope my response here isn&#8217;t too &#8220;dyed-in-the-wool&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk

 Served from: pinsofwar.com @ 2014-06-11 04:47:22 by W3 Total Cache -->