<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rumours of Warhammer Fantasy Dwarves, an Expansions &amp; 9th Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="/warhammer-dwarf-expansion-rumours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://pinsofwar.com/warhammer-dwarf-expansion-rumours/</link>
	<description>Warhammer 40K &#38; Wargaming Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warhammer Visions &#38; White Dwarf Weekly Cover Preview</title>
		<link>https://pinsofwar.com/warhammer-dwarf-expansion-rumours/#comment-5230</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Warhammer Visions &#38; White Dwarf Weekly Cover Preview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2014 20:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pinsofwar.com/?p=21775#comment-5230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Also&#8230; Dwarves! [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Also&#8230; Dwarves! [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gordon ashacker</title>
		<link>https://pinsofwar.com/warhammer-dwarf-expansion-rumours/#comment-4546</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gordon ashacker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2013 04:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pinsofwar.com/?p=21775#comment-4546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Triumph and Treachery looks pretty accurate.5out of 5 for that one. The new beginner set sounds awesome! I&#039;ll buy two sets! 4 out of 5. New Dwarves! I hope so, but I would really, really like to see a Battle Blimp! 3out of 5.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Triumph and Treachery looks pretty accurate.5out of 5 for that one. The new beginner set sounds awesome! I&#8217;ll buy two sets! 4 out of 5. New Dwarves! I hope so, but I would really, really like to see a Battle Blimp! 3out of 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabio</title>
		<link>https://pinsofwar.com/warhammer-dwarf-expansion-rumours/#comment-4240</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fabio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pinsofwar.com/?p=21775#comment-4240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the chance for GW to smash any Dwarf competition down, the failed AoW Indiegogo campaign proved little, and apart some good sculpts (except the monkey arms) there is really nothing else to show. Also war-cast vs plastic is another thing, everyone I know of prefers plastic, and the DE release proves GW can really produce something good when needed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the chance for GW to smash any Dwarf competition down, the failed AoW Indiegogo campaign proved little, and apart some good sculpts (except the monkey arms) there is really nothing else to show. Also war-cast vs plastic is another thing, everyone I know of prefers plastic, and the DE release proves GW can really produce something good when needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProdigalPlayer</title>
		<link>https://pinsofwar.com/warhammer-dwarf-expansion-rumours/#comment-4227</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ProdigalPlayer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 14:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pinsofwar.com/?p=21775#comment-4227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: Dwarfs, one can hope.  The current range of plastics really lacks the humor and character of the old sculpts so I totally welcome a reboot if it makes them less bland.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Dwarfs, one can hope.  The current range of plastics really lacks the humor and character of the old sculpts so I totally welcome a reboot if it makes them less bland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Rampant</title>
		<link>https://pinsofwar.com/warhammer-dwarf-expansion-rumours/#comment-4225</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles Rampant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 08:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pinsofwar.com/?p=21775#comment-4225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hum, some interesting stuff there. I&#039;m not sure that I dare to believe some of it!

So the Starter Box rumours: these I feel are a 1, as it seems like this reverses the trend (holding from 3rd 40k) for there to br a single, simple route into the game. It seems like this would create unwanted confusion among potential new buyers. In addition, the specified forces are quite dull - I find it hard to imagine that GW would put OnG into the box without giving them some insane large model. The Snotling Pump Wagon would seem to be a logical one. 

Dwarves are hard to say. Nobody believed the DE rumours of so many plastic boxes. Certainly the Dwarf models are really dated and weak at this stage (even their characters look crap) so they could do with it. Noteworthy that they seem to be avoiding adding more warmachines. I give this a 3; could be true.

Triumph and Treachery sounds a bit odd, but does undeniably sound like the sort of thing that GW would convince itself there was demand for. I&#039;ll give this a 4, but it is the least interesting out of the three.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hum, some interesting stuff there. I&#8217;m not sure that I dare to believe some of it!</p>
<p>So the Starter Box rumours: these I feel are a 1, as it seems like this reverses the trend (holding from 3rd 40k) for there to br a single, simple route into the game. It seems like this would create unwanted confusion among potential new buyers. In addition, the specified forces are quite dull &#8211; I find it hard to imagine that GW would put OnG into the box without giving them some insane large model. The Snotling Pump Wagon would seem to be a logical one. </p>
<p>Dwarves are hard to say. Nobody believed the DE rumours of so many plastic boxes. Certainly the Dwarf models are really dated and weak at this stage (even their characters look crap) so they could do with it. Noteworthy that they seem to be avoiding adding more warmachines. I give this a 3; could be true.</p>
<p>Triumph and Treachery sounds a bit odd, but does undeniably sound like the sort of thing that GW would convince itself there was demand for. I&#8217;ll give this a 4, but it is the least interesting out of the three.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk

 Served from: pinsofwar.com @ 2014-02-10 09:26:51 by W3 Total Cache -->